From Invisible Oranges
In February, Sweden’s Trespasser released a scathing statement on debt by flipping Biblical themes and reviving thousand-year-old poetry to mirror modern political ailments. ἈΠΟΚΆΛΥΨΙΣ is the duo’s second album, and though its ambitions are lofty, its sound is anything but. Trespasser, comprised of composer/instrumentalist XVI and vocalist Dräparn, prefer clear production quality and blunt force, the latter of which reflects their anarchist ideals. They repurpose the urgency often found in hardcore punk into a meaty yet triumphant barrage that’s outgrown their former black metal distinction.
ἈΠΟΚΆΛΥΨΙΣ’s funds have partially been donated to the Rojava Donation Fund, with XVI vowing to donate all funds once he’s broken even with the recording costs. He’s also outlined tangible actions that’d push the people under our current political frameworks into better situations and recognizes that theory only goes so far. In short, XVI puts his money where his mouth is, and sonically, ἈΠΟΚΆΛΥΨΙΣ translates that sentiment. It roars rather than skulks, brimming with energy as if Trespasser are trying to mobilize action through music alone. XVI was kind enough to sip a few drinks and answer questions about Trespasser’s new album, music’s place in political contexts, and the simple joys of farming, among other topics.
...
...
I love the imagery present in “Flakes of Ash.” What was your intent when pairing images of mythological beasts, like satyrs, and establishments with anarchist ideals?
The idea from the beginning with Trespasser was to combine some sort of black metal aesthetic and anarchist ideals. Even the band name was meant to have connotations to both anarchism's critique of property as well as Christian liturgy (Lord’s Prayer). The first record paired the black metal sonic style with lyrics about anarchist history. The new record tied more to black metal lyrical fixation on (inverted) biblical themes, but moved away from, or at least mixed up, the typical black metal sound.
The “satyrs”-verse you refer to is partly stolen from a biblical verse from an apocalyptic passage in Isaiah 13:21-22 about the destruction of Babylon, which for early Christians was the symbol of everything bad in the world. Isaiah was a prophet who had visions of that which was to come. So “Flakes of Ash” is precisely that, a vision into the future where we have overcome some of the trials and tribulations of our struggle and can start to explore humanity's full potential.
I feel like if we have a clear aim of what we want for ourselves and what we need as humans, and if we start to envision and pronounce those goals, it's easier to know what the hell to do in the present. Also, to know that there have been people around for thousands of years that have fought and strived for similar goals can be uplifting. Of course, you can see it the other way around if you are cynical and be like, “Nothing has changed for 6000 years, what’s the fucking point?!” - but I choose to see our current political current as part of a long tradition of rebellion against oppression and tyranny and that it is our historical duty and task to see that struggle through to the end.
Of course, the peoples and prophets of the Bible (Isaiah is from the Old Testament, while the Book of Revelation is the last chapter of the New Testament) had a totally different political and cultural horizon, so it's not like we can just take their struggle and make it ours. The similarities are very shallow. But to be inspired by the language and poetry and the general feeling of longing for “something else,” I think, can be of some sort of help. The poetry is strong in that book.
I recently spoke with Dawn Ray’d’s Simon Barr and asked him a similar question; how can music serve anarchist goals in ways other artistic mediums cannot?
I really believe that music is powerful and can change both thought and action, but I am aware that it is a very subjective belief. I think any art form can ‘serve the struggle’ as well - and we need all the output and input we can get. I don’t think music has a special position here. Well, in a way, it does, because all you need to make music is your body, and even imprisoned people can sing.
But music isn't in itself revolutionary. As I've said before, it doesn't matter how many songs about anarchist subjects you write if it stays ‘just’ music. It has to have an effect on people's everyday actions. It has to reach outside of being just entertainment and a pastime. In the anarcho-punk scene where I come from, we tried to create a physical milieu free from commercial interest and hierarchical order - as well as collecting money for necessitous causes - with inclusion and cooperation as lead words. The thousand upon thousand punk rock songs that were played on stage while the same people got drunk every weekend had little to do with this, it was the physical and material organization of volunteers and activists that created that temporary and situated utopia. With Trespasser, I wanted to build on this, but I was never a good activist. My dedication always waned and I had a hard time following through. One constant in my life was music, so I figured if I wanted to make rebellion and political struggle a part of my life until my dying breath, it was through making music that I could stay a revolutionary.
But I wanted to reach outside the punk scene, which often is self-sufficient in a navel-gazing way. The metal scene, even if it's still quite closed and limited, has a much bigger potential reach. Every record sold is a few dollars to our Rojava Donation Fund, and if I had the capacity to make a decent album in a more mainstream genre, I’d probably do that. But blast beat metal is my passion and you need passion to make good music. Still, with Trespasser, I don't aim in any way to stay exclusive, cult, or esoteric. We’re basically a pop band with all the hooks and shit. The means is mass appeal - the end is mass revolt.
But get me right here, I’m talking about the musical output, not the culture of resistance we are a part of. I think we - the rock ‘n roll underground - have got a lot of things right in our organization and our ideals, but to consciously limit ourselves and be proud to be small, strange, and unapproachable is the totally wrong way to go - if we want to change the world, that is.
Why do you consider debt to be the greatest modern struggle?
Did I say that? I think I meant something like this: through the lens of debt, we can have an interesting, sobering, and fruitful look at capitalist modernity and neo-liberal society. If we want to raise class awareness in this post-class world (ha!), we need to focus on the things the everyday people struggle with and the things in their life where they can go, “Ah! I get what you're saying when you say that there is injustice and oppression in our society still”, and I think debt is the biggest such thing. We can't dwell on the standard Marxist slogans anymore, we need to reinvent the vocabulary and make visible new battlefronts of class war. If I start talking about surplus value or base and superstructure with my workmates, they’ll go “Huh?” But if we start talking about mortgages and who really owns their cars and houses, I have an in to start debating economic injustice in this world that, for many, feels “just” to some extent. Much because we've been told that capitalism (social democracy) has solved poverty and injustice in the West.
I know I have been mentioning David Graeber's “Debt” a few times in interviews and the record sleeve. I can really recommend the book, but we don't need that 700-page brick to see the unsustainability of a debt-consumerist society. What the book can do is help to historically situate the widespread and almost hereditary aversion against money lenders, bankers, merchants, and money changers. It can also help explain why debt and loaning is historically seen as amoral, and if we can spread this “knowledge” or view, we can undress capitalist society (with debt as a main pillar of its inner workings) as deeply immoral, repulsive, and anti humane. Debt is the answer to how money is made, how the colonial hegemony is upheld, and how we are kept in the modern wage-slave carousel. It's this insight that is one of the αποκαλύψεις of the album title. We all know capitalist society is deeply immoral in theory, some of us even feel it in our hearts and our bones. But how do we spread this information and feeling to people outside of theoretical socialism? I think discussions around debt could be a powerful ally in raising class awareness and gaining proselytes.
You gave a quote to Rocking.gr where you said, “I am a bit tired of the left always being negatively reactive to any societal problem and I think the way forward is creating your own positive vision and work towards it.” I agree with this. I know debt removal is one of your ideas of positive actions, but are there other ways forward you try to inspire?
That quote I stand by, as is!
But to clarify - debt goes hand in hand with the economic growth of our current system - because how else would you produce the interest? - which in turn goes hand in hand with the exploitation of proletarians and the earth. So debt removal is not possible without the demise of the entire capitalist society, so what I'm calling for is a wider revolution that would also entail the destruction of the debt-capital-banking system.
Also, I want to make clear that I think that we can work for reform within the current system even as anarchists, as long as we don't lose track of our long-term goal - gaining followers and eventually realizing the truly classless society. Anarchism, for me, is struggle by any means necessary, and sometimes parliamentary means are necessary. The small steps are also steps, and in many instances, the small steps are safer and more long-lasting.
So, inside the current system, I would suggest replacing military service/conscription with social service, so that every person gets a year of experience in health care, schools, or other social work; instead of learning how to destroy, we learn how to build and how to take care. But, this implies a certain amount of compulsion, which is a hard-to-swallow pill for many anarchists, even for myself. Or maybe this idea builds too close to where NSDAPs “Arbeitsdienst” is digging? Discuss in small groups, please.
I also believe that weapons handling and guerilla warfare should be taught to everyone who wants it. This might lead to civil war and unwanted right-wing revolutions according to many, so maybe not worth proposing as a national programme? Let’s keep this training on the DL for now.
All jokes aside, what I was really talking about in the quote above was Rojava as a guiding star upon a wider left-wing horizon. Instead of focusing our energy on fighting a small insignificant group of weirdos within a fringe subgenre of a metal subgenre (heavy metal->black metal->NSBM) or even wasting ALL our energy on ‘identifying’ as anti-nazi and anti-fascist, we should put our energy into supporting the very few actual materialized revolutionary projects out there in the real world - they are not perfect according to anarchist theory, don't think that I am not painfully aware - but they need every bit of support they can get. On a wider historical-human-culture scale, Rojava is an amazing thing. Totally one-of-a-kind. Let’s support, let's learn, let's import, let’s implement. Don’t be a Eurocentric racist bookworm.
One final thing about building our identity around phrases starting with anti-. Most of those following suffixes to the ‘anti’ are political projects already negated by the liberal/neo-liberal agenda. And honestly, what do we have in common with the liberals? We’re both anti-fascist, anti-nazi, and anti-nationalist, but for totally different reasons - we have a very different view of the Endgame. In this instance, our enemy's enemies are not our friends.
I have to commend you for your donations to Rojava. Which projects are you donating to there?
Thank you! Every cent from Bandcamp sales of ЧОМУ НЕ ВИЙШЛО? still goes into the Rojava Donation Fund, as well as half of ἈΠΟΚΆΛΥΨΙΣ sales until I break even with the recording costs. Then I’ll donate it all. I mean, it's not much, but I think we've contributed around 3,000 euros from the first LP and are about to send another 900 from the new one.
Recently I've been in contact with people from inside the occupied Afrin region, as well as the Swedish Rojava Committees (RC), and have tried to follow official YPG social media. The official organs say that donating through Heyva Sor (Kurdish Red Crescent, humanitarian help
organization) is the safest way to get money and help into the Autonomous Administration (Rojava). The sad part is that they can't get through to the Turkish/jihadist-occupied territories, like Afrin, where, from what I’ve heard, the occupational forces plunder the few relief dispatches coming through and sell them on the black market. Not sure if this is trustworthy information, but what is sure is that no Heyva Sor shipments can reach these occupied territories. So it’s a mess. Also, it's hard to get support to the actual fighting resistance. This is a matter of life and death, so I get that people are being careful. If you know how, hit me up on Telegram/Signal/Wickr, I’m sure I can pay for a pack of cigarettes or two. But still. Heyva Sor does great work on the ground inside the Autonomous Administration, so I've been sending a lot of funds through them. I've also supported a tree-planting project - “Make Rojava Green Again” - through the Internationalist Commune.
The Rojava Committees in Sweden always have some projects rolling, so I'm trying to keep up there. But Sweden is now tightening up their terrorist legislation in hope of getting into NATO, i.e trying to appease Turkey by clamping down on anything remotely tied to the PKK. Which definitely affects any pro-Rojava sentiments.
If you wanna help: follow official Rojava-accounts on social media and see what's up; see what organizations or projects are active in your area and support them; Heyva Sor; buy merch and books from any pro-Rojava organization.
On a related note, does contributing to an external charity through Trespasser funds influence the direction you take the project?
Yes! When I saw Trespasser taking off and making some 3,000 euros from Bandcamp by the first record alone, I saw the potential and got inspired to grow even more - it felt like this way of resistance was working. I could both inspire people through lyrics and music, and get some money transferred to help revolutionary projects.
So I guess my decision to clean up the production, vary the songwriting even more, and include a talented and artistic friend in making the artwork for the new record to some extent has to do with being able to get more funds to Rojava in the end.
I'll straight up say it - Trespasser is about making money, not for me, but for the revolution. This is not the only thing that matters of course, but it's high on the list.
Another quote from Rocking.gr that I wanted to ask about - “since I started Trespasser, because like you said - politics is a main pillar of the band. Which logically means I want to reach as many people with this art as possible, which also means black metal is kinda a stupid scene to adhere to.” Could you make the case that it’s better to spread your politics in the black metal sphere because of the genre’s sketchy political affiliations? I.e. you’d be able to reach more people willing to hear your message because it’s in a style they already enjoy?
Well I hope that my main audience isn't from the “true” black metal sphere, cause those people fucking suck, but instead, I can reel in people intrigued by black metal before they get sucked into that hole of hate, violence, and despair. But yeah, it's a hard question. Of course, I hope that I can convert some black metallers and give them an alternative to fucking life-hating nihilistic war flag-waving macho music.
But I mean, it comes down to your definition of that scene. My experience in Sweden with the “true” black metal scene is that they are quite old and very set in their ways. So it would be foolish to waste energy on trying to reach or convert them. On the other hand, if we're talking about the younger generations, then yes, it's a battle worth fighting, those kids that start to discover black metal with a more open mindset. There I think I actually can make a difference in shaping their views on what music - and politics! - is and can be.
About the last part of the question: It depends on what they enjoy with the style. Many people identifying as black metal do it because of the satanic ideology and ethos. So when a band isn't satanic, evil, or anti-humanist, they don't consider it black metal and dismiss it. So no, Trespasser isn't about saving the black metal scene, but about building an alternative that is truly radical in this world. Because if you think about it, the true black metal scene is a boot-licking propaganda machine for the ruling interests in contemporary society and just propagates the same piss that's been spewed out by both religious and profane rulers from Plato to the Romans to Ancient Egypt to Machiavelli - the right of power, the fascination with war, and the rule of the big-dicked patriarch.
To be truly radical and progressive in this world means to have trust in your fellow comrade, faith in another world, hope in peace and to give power to the filthy masses! (Gravpel whatsup!)
For writing such an apocalyptic album and playing with such violence, Trespasser ultimately sounds like an optimistic project. Is there an intention to not sound nihilistic, especially in modern times?
Haha! We play with passion and energy, not violence! But yeah, we have enough of that nihilism, if we by that mean despair and/or indifference, Trespasser is about hope and faith. It's a tired cliche but this system was created by human hands, so it can also be dismantled by them. And just a little note on your phrasing, apocalypse in this context means unveiling or revelation and not the end of days. So that's not supposed to be negatively interpreted either. Well, you could say that the revelations we sing about will bring about the end of the world, in a sense, but not in a fiery vengeful inferno, more in a flowery, blooming Elysium.
Speaking of - the second very important revelation of this record (in addition to the aforementioned insight about the immorality of debt in the capitalist system) that has been forgotten in our hyper-individualistic time is the realization that the power and potential lies with the working people. It's not completely forgotten, it is just covered by a thick layer of cynicism, despair, and individualism. But soon, it will flare up through the soil - like a raging wildfire. And soon, we will start to feel it. Actually feel it in our hearts and bones. This will create a chain reaction of agitation and awakening, and then very soon, we will have that critical mass of people needed to create the self-sustaining, ecological, ever-evolving, and classless society of our dreams. No doubt, no doubt. Just keep swimming.
“Holókaustos, or the Justification and Affirmation of Hierarchical Order by the Symbolism of Immolations” may be my favorite track on the album, from its chorus to its deviation from the rest of ἈΠΟΚΆΛΥΨΙΣ to its message. Hyperproduction and consumption is a big issue I have with the world as well. Unsurprisingly, I loved your take on the subject. I’m just gushing at this point.
Haha, gush away. I'm flattered that you've taken your time to actually listen to the record and read the lyrics!
You know what happened when the Roman Empire died? The biggest wave of people moved back out to the countryside, started to grow their own food, and started self-sustaining small colonies. This happens a lot when empires die. Out of necessity and not ideology, of course.
But for me, this looming future is also a beacon of hope. Can't wait to meet some new friends out here in the wild! We just need to physically, mentally, and ideologically prepare the populace for this. My dream and one of my positive visions that actually could be realized within the parliamentary system, at least in theory, is the adjustment to a more self-sustaining and local society with far-reaching limitations of import. I think we are heading this way already, with a higher interest in prepping, a political discussion on how to fight the climate crisis, Swedish farmers fucking angry to be outcompeted by imported goods, and so on. Also, a discussion about global supply chains that leads to at least some sort of panic about how vulnerable Sweden, or any country really, is to the whims of global trade. I don't know, I am skeptical that anyone comes to the right conclusions here, but where there is room for discussion, there is room to drive in an anarchist wedge.
...
ἈΠΟΚΆΛΥΨΙΣ released February 3rd and is available on Bandcamp.
Comments
This band sends DMCAs to
Tim Mon, 04/17/2023 - 03:46
This band sends DMCAs to blogs that offer their two albums for download. Like WTF is a Swedish anarchist black metal band doing using American laws to send take down orders to blogs? Bizarre.
I guess they need to make money somehow for the revolution (for realz? lol) and so they can support a tree-planting effort to "make Rojava green again" when it was never a woodland/foresty area, but rather a semi-arid marsh land. Makes total sense to attempt to destroy the biodiversity of the area to plant trees
Hey dude, it was an extensive
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 04:30
In reply to This band sends DMCAs to by Tim
Hey dude, it was an extensive wetlands which supported a rich diversity of migratory water birds but was drained by corporate agricultural entities. They are hardly a black metal band, more a green wash wood band, like Black Sabbath on lithium.
Yeah, like Saddam redirected
Tim Wed, 04/19/2023 - 01:31
In reply to Hey dude, it was an extensive by anon (not verified)
Yeah, like Saddam redirected both the Tigris and Euphrates. Lithium as in soft metal, batteries or the mood stabilizer? I've never heard of this band. My post was obviously a shitpost. Afaict only one person, Calv, noticed it and pointed it out. I can't believe so many and the topmod just blindly believed some rando (moi) making up baseless accusations lol. No wonder it's so easy to "cancel" people among anarchists or leftists in general. Proof isn't needed.
The mood stabilizer youngster
Oscar W (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 01:58
In reply to Yeah, like Saddam redirected by Tim
The mood stabilizer youngster. Black Sabbath were a pioneering heavy metal band of the 60's known for wild psychotic stage performances like ripping live chicken heads off with mouth and heavy drug use. Ever heard of this dude Ozzie Osmond and album Paranoid makes Tresspasser look light Catholic choirboys,,,,
Ozzie, Oswald, Ozman,
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 02:11
In reply to Yeah, like Saddam redirected by Tim
Ozzie, Oswald, Ozman, Ossthing,,,,
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LQUXuQ6Zd9w
proof isn't needed
anonymous (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 07:26
In reply to Yeah, like Saddam redirected by Tim
or no one took you seriously enough to worry about it. that's the interpretation of events for me. but you should by all means keep considering yourself very important and also on the cutting edge of understanding.
lol, you silly troll
Calv (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 05:27
In reply to This band sends DMCAs to by Tim
I tried searching the page for "DCMA" or "copyright" and there aren't any mentions of the band using the rights mafia to generate the proceeds for this process!
Hello Calv,
rocinante Mon, 04/17/2023 - 12:39
In reply to lol, you silly troll by Calv (not verified)
Hello Calv,
Strong sentiment from you here for little reason. This interview doesn't mention DMCA, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. Often DMCA requests are sent to the email associated with a website or the maintainers and more often than not this information is not shared publicly. Overall, it's sad to hear that anarchists are using DMCA takedown requests against other anarchists.
Expected response from the
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 12:58
In reply to Hello Calv, by rocinante
Expected response from the guy that wants anarchists writers to starve so he can post their books in their entirety on his tOootally anarchist library website.
As an author I spent years
Trash Man (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 13:05
In reply to Expected response from the by anon (not verified)
As an author I spent years researching and writing my book only to get a small deal from an anarchist publisher hoping that the royalties from book sales would allow me to pay my rent, buy groceries, and write more books. Each book I published wound up on the anarchist library and I never saw a penny. I now have to work as a trash collector and my body is wrecked and I am too exhausted to write all thanks to your website and your devaluing of anarchist writers trying to scrape by in a capitalist society. Thanks a lot.
I can't tell if this is a
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 16:41
In reply to As an author I spent years by Trash Man (not verified)
I can't tell if this is a troll, or if there are really people who think anarchist publishing is profitable.
I also can't tell if this is
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 17:48
In reply to I can't tell if this is a by anon (not verified)
I also can't tell if this is a troll, or if there are really people who are justifying the exploitation of anarchist writers and artists because anarchist publishing isn't as profitable as non-anarchist publishing?
Also, if you have never seen just how well off the major North American anarchist publishers are living you should probably keep out of it.
Fuck you, pay me.
I cannot emphasize enough how
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:03
In reply to I also can't tell if this is by anon (not verified)
I cannot emphasize enough how little I or anyone who isn't a fool cares about your "exploitation" of not being able to make a living writing anarchist materials.
It's nice that you feel you
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:10
In reply to I cannot emphasize enough how by anon (not verified)
It's nice that you feel you can speak for everyone and that anyone who you can't speak for is a fool. That's a very healthy way to view other. Imagine your miserable world without writers, artists, musicians. Whom would your untalented egotistical self exploit then?
My world has writers, artists
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:14
In reply to It's nice that you feel you by anon (not verified)
My world has writers, artists, musicians, since I currently live in this world. I'm just not dumb enough to cry about not getting paid for anarchist content.
-- a professionally published author
OooOooh nOoo "a
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:28
In reply to My world has writers, artists by anon (not verified)
OooOooh nOoo "a professionally published author" with zero reading comprehension. Where did anyone but you assert that the author above was writing "anarchist content"? OooOooh nOoo your whole argument falls apart but you can't ever admit that you're wrong on justifying one group exploiting another pooOooh nOoo!
The whole discussion was
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:37
In reply to OooOooh nOoo "a by anon (not verified)
The whole discussion was explicitly about anarchist content, read the thread ("Each book I published wound up on the anarchist library and I never saw a penny"). Nobody would dispute that authors can make a living publishing stuff, the point being made is that this person is objectively a fool if they thought that anarchist publishing in particular was a way to do that -- as evidenced by the fact they're not making any money (to be fair, that could be because their writing is crap, and given their reasoning abilities, I would not be surprised if that were true too, but the more likely answer is there's no money to be made writing anarchist material, something I had assumed everyone who knows anything about anarchists would have been able to figure out).
It was not "anarchist content
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:51
In reply to The whole discussion was by anon (not verified)
It was not "anarchist content".
Additionally, the presence of it on the anarchist library ended up spoiling a foreign rights/translation deal that would have went through otherwise.
Fuck off.
If it wasn't anarchist
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:59
In reply to It was not "anarchist content by anon (not verified)
If it wasn't anarchist content, then how did it end up on T@L? Why did you never point this out earlier in the thread? Why did you refer to yourself as an anarchist writer working with an anarchist publisher? Again, I cannot emphasize enough how little I and other reasonable people (yes, I feel safe generalizing here, no hubris necessary) care about your plight of "anarchists won't pay me".
Also, FWIW, T@L has always had a policy of taking down texts at the request of the author, not even a DMCA necessary. But then you wouldn't have an excuse for why your book wasn't selling, so who's to say whether that would have been a good move.
Different anon here. Why are
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:04
In reply to If it wasn't anarchist by anon (not verified)
Different anon here. Why are you simping for people doing capitalist business, who call themselves anarchists but who literally own the means of production but aren't paying the people whose work they are capitalising on?
You don't speak for me.
Lol wtf are you talking about
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:06
In reply to Different anon here. Why are by anon (not verified)
Lol wtf are you talking about? Who is capitalizing on T@L?
You don't read so good, buddy
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:08
In reply to Lol wtf are you talking about by anon (not verified)
You don't read so good, buddy. Try again. Take your time.
Yes, I must be missing
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:10
In reply to You don't read so good, buddy by anon (not verified)
Yes, I must be missing something, so please, explain this one to me. The person is complaining that their book isn't selling because it got uploaded to T@L, and I'm saying the book was never going to be profitable regardless. Who is making money by exploiting this situation?
Different different anon here
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:15
In reply to Yes, I must be missing by anon (not verified)
Different different anon here.
The answer to your question is: The publisher.
Au revoir
... are you under the
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:17
In reply to Different different anon here by anon (not verified)
... are you under the impression that publishers make money by not selling books? Again, in detail, explain to me the process by which uploading a book to T@L makes anyone more money.
OMG BRO. The publisher makes
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:22
In reply to ... are you under the by anon (not verified)
OMG BRO. The publisher makes money from the initial book sales minus an advance against royalties. The anarchist library publishing the book prevents any future sales so the writer will never earn out their advance and never receives royalties.
I thought you were "a professional author"?? This is basic!
Once again, explain to me how
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:24
In reply to OMG BRO. The publisher makes by anon (not verified)
Once again, explain to me how this makes the publisher *more* money. Explain to me how saying "you were never going to make a profit on this" is "simping" for bosses, and not a demonstrable fact.
OMG
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:27
In reply to Once again, explain to me how by anon (not verified)
OMG
Different OMG here,
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:29
In reply to Once again, explain to me how by anon (not verified)
Different OMG here,
https://anarchistnews.org/comment/53482#comment-53482
Do failed book deals make
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:31
In reply to Different OMG here, by anon (not verified)
Do failed book deals make money?
Wow you are a seriously
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:33
In reply to Do failed book deals make by anon (not verified)
Wow you are a seriously broken brained individual. God bless you.
.
.
.
.
.
(Why did the foreign deal fall through, sweaty? Take your time.)
Because the publisher thought
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:36
In reply to Wow you are a seriously by anon (not verified)
Because the publisher thought it wouldn't be profitable. I.e., there was no way to make money on it. I.e., nobody made money by it being uploaded.
Perhaps the librarians should
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:56
In reply to If it wasn't anarchist by anon (not verified)
Perhaps the librarians should attempt to ask living authors if they want their works scanned and posted to the library before doing so and thus ruining any chance at the author of seeing any income for their hard work?
I mean, I guess they could,
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 20:10
In reply to Perhaps the librarians should by anon (not verified)
I mean, I guess they could, and I'm surprised this needs saying, but most anarchist publications are not profitable. LBC has openly talked about this in the past (projects barely make even at best), as has Wolfi (has never made money on his books). I suppose some of the big name venues like AK and PM might shovel out profitable mass-appeal crap, but even that I'm guessing they don't break that much above even. If you go into writing an anarchist book with the idea that it will pay your rent, you are making a mistake, bar none. The only things that make money in this world are things that somehow interact with people who have it, and by and large, that is not anarchists. If you wanted to convince T@L of this policy, I suspect you'd have a better shot at appealing to sentimentality of the written word, because there's just not much profit motive to appeal to when it comes to niche texts targeted at anarchists.
Don't you find it strange
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 20:40
In reply to I mean, I guess they could, by anon (not verified)
Don't you find it strange that you (and the library) are making this decision for the authors without their input? That you are justifying what is absolutely the exploitation of an other's work with your "well actually even the publishers don't make that much money" assertions? How is this in anyway anarchic behavior? This is an example of people with means, power, and influence, taking advantage and deciding for people without. Just think about it.
Additionally, you should look at how much warehouses, printing machines, paper stock, and rent (mortgages) are in the areas where these NA anarchist publishers are operating out of. But of course you know already ;-)
I'm not sure where you're
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 20:51
In reply to Don't you find it strange by anon (not verified)
I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that there's some long lineage of intellectual property support in the anarchist scene, you may be lost. But in any case, no, I do not find it strange that T@L does not police submissions beyond a basic pass of "is it anarchist, and will be be in legal trouble if we host it".
If you didn't know, the people who work at places like LBC don't work there for a living, it's a spare-time project that they're basically funding from their real jobs. That doesn't make the presses profitable, quite the opposite.
You are scanning and
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 20:59
In reply to I'm not sure where you're by anon (not verified)
You are scanning and publishing entire books by living anarchist authors without their input and you are now asserting that this is somehow fine. It is not "policing" to contact a living author and saying, "hey we'd love to publish your book in its entirety or as an excerpt on our spare-time library project, how would you feel about that?"--it's basic anarchistic behavior.
You can not ever justify authoritarian behavior and dress it up as anarchist and what you are trying to justify is authoritarian behavior.
Also why are you continually insistent that this is about LBC? Guilt much?
T@L doesn't scan and upload
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 21:04
In reply to You are scanning and by anon (not verified)
T@L doesn't scan and upload anything, randos on the internet do that. To refuse to accept a submission without first tracking down whether the original author is alive, who they are, and how to contact them is indeed policing submissions, you're being silly to suggest otherwise.
>what you are trying to justify is authoritarian behavior.
It's really not.
>Also why are you continually insistent that this is about LBC? Guilt much?
I did no such thing. I literally have no idea who you are or what you mean by this, but if you're implying I'm associated with LBC, I'm not and never have been, I'm just most familiar with that publisher and the people who work there (I don't even live in the US).
"T@L doesn't scan and upload
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 21:11
In reply to T@L doesn't scan and upload by anon (not verified)
"T@L doesn't scan and upload anything,"
This is entirely untrue. You don't need to make things up to defend your authoritarian position. I stopped reading after your first sentence (lie). I am no longer responding to you because you are obviously trolling in bad faith.
Yes, refusing to read the
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 21:15
In reply to "T@L doesn't scan and upload by anon (not verified)
Yes, refusing to read the second sentence that explains the distinction because it contradicts your understanding is the sign of an entirely reasoned and level-headed engagement with the subject at hand. I'm glad we had this discussion, clearly I was wrong and you were right and you should totally keep trying to live paycheck to paycheck on royalties from media targeting broke motherfuckers, my mistake.
TIL only broke motherfuckers
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 21:52
In reply to Yes, refusing to read the by anon (not verified)
TIL only broke motherfuckers are interested in books and that authors should just write everything for free because "a professional author" on Anews thinks so.
Again, this about anarchist
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 21:59
In reply to TIL only broke motherfuckers by anon (not verified)
Again, this about anarchist content specifically. As has been stated elsewhere, people can and obviously do make a living writing non-anarchist material. I have never in my life heard of someone who paid rent writing anarchist books.
OooOooh nOoo, creativity
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:17
In reply to It's nice that you feel you by anon (not verified)
OooOooh nOoo, creativity doesn't belong in the market place, it's about doing your own creativity in the Now for your own self and the folk you have relationships with. Like making your own shoes, singing at the dinner table or whilst digging in the vegetable garden, about fun and non-transactional creativoty.
OooOooh nOoo tell the
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 18:29
In reply to OooOooh nOoo, creativity by anon (not verified)
OooOooh nOoo tell the anarchist publishers to make and give away all the books for free then and everyone can do what they love outside of the marketplace for free like equals yay!
YeeEees, that's the general
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:19
In reply to OooOooh nOoo tell the by anon (not verified)
YeeEees, that's the general idea, everything is free without copyrights, thus no buildup of ressentiment from "artiste" types.
Is this like that Bakunin
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 10:23
In reply to YeeEees, that's the general by anon (not verified)
Is this like that Bakunin quote where he said something like:
'On the topic of shoes, I go to the local shoemaker's shop and take all their shoes, add my brand name to them, and sell them out of my mom's basement because everyone should have shoes and fuck shoemakers for trying to prevent their own starvation and houselessness under capitalism. I could make cool shoes if I wanted to but I, like, don't even want to, bro.'
Something like that?
Nope, it's from Stirner and
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 11:39
In reply to Is this like that Bakunin by anon (not verified)
Nope, it's from Stirner and goes something like this :-
I have the power within me to do anything within these powers. I can kill a rabbit and skin it, eat the flesh, and wrap the skin [fur on the inside ;) ] around my feet [ 2 rabbits is better ;)] and presto, I have a pair of shoes and food to keep me alive for 1 week. How easy was that, autonomy and not having to sell myself or my labour to anyone. I am truly free of social restraints, beliefs and tedious cultural methodologies. Thankyou.
Behold the internet anarch!
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 11:46
In reply to Nope, it's from Stirner and by anon (not verified)
Behold the internet anarch! Puts the skin of one rabbit over both feet (fur on the inside) like a merman and wonders why he keeps falling down when getting up to go to raid mom's fridge
Individualist Rabbit Shoes 101
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 12:48
In reply to Behold the internet anarch! by anon (not verified)
On a freezing night both feet inside one rabbit skin would prevent frostbite. With 2 rabbits, the individual would not fall down when walking.
Ok, bro. Nice save.
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 13:00
In reply to Individualist Rabbit Shoes 101 by anon (not verified)
Ok, bro. Nice save.
Thx. Also, I'm glad the whole
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 13:46
In reply to Ok, bro. Nice save. by anon (not verified)
Thx. Also, I'm glad the whole artiste, creativity, celebrity fame, copyright thing has been put through the mill and we anarchs can feel comfortable with our own anonymous mediocrity, sincerely cheers, not being sarcastic.
Oh I'm not mediocre by any
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 13:52
In reply to Thx. Also, I'm glad the whole by anon (not verified)
Oh I'm not mediocre by any standard. I am an anarch at the top of my game that just finished a very lucrative EU tour and just landed a major deal. I would have rather kept it "in the family" but didn't like getting screwed by supposed anarchist publishers. Have fun with your acoustic metal songwriting. Not being sarcastic.
Thnx brah, enjoy,,,
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 14:52
In reply to Oh I'm not mediocre by any by anon (not verified)
Thnx brah, enjoy,,,
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xnnDg01Y3oY
As an poor anarch reader I
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 03:50
In reply to As an author I spent years by Trash Man (not verified)
As an poor anarch reader I spent years trying to save for books only to get free graffitti from anarchist graffitti writers living in squats,,,I couldn't pay rent, buy groceries, and read any books. Each graffitti message was never published, it wound up painted over and I never saw them again. I now have to work as a trash collector and only read 1 week old newspapers covered in excrement, and my body is wrecked and I am too exhausted to read graffitti, but thanks to your website and your valuing of anarchist writers trying to scrape by in a capitalist society, I do get free anarchist books. ThAnks A lOt ;)
gotem
hurr hurrr (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 08:30
In reply to As an poor anarch reader I by anon (not verified)
gotem
The Unz Review will publish
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 17:26
In reply to As an author I spent years by Trash Man (not verified)
The Unz Review will publish your work, and even give you a payout if it's politically volatile.
Calv
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 13:04
In reply to Hello Calv, by rocinante
Yeah, im against it but nobody is pointing to where this band or publishers are doing this. Im against it too, ive gotten DCMA threats for pirating digital media.
calv again, rocinante
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 13:08
In reply to Hello Calv, by rocinante
I appreciate it when people back up their accussations.
We anons appreciate you Calv
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 13:14
In reply to calv again, rocinante by anon (not verified)
We anons appreciate you Calv
Anarchist musicians must do
TranslationBVT (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 12:54
In reply to This band sends DMCAs to by Tim
Anarchist musicians must do their music for free, live in squalor, and starve to death cuz 03:46 doesn't value art or artists and is cheap to buy a fucking record..
OooOooh nOooo, We are All in
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 15:39
In reply to Anarchist musicians must do by TranslationBVT (not verified)
OooOooh nOooo, We are All in the gUtter, but sOme of Us are loOking at thE stARs.
I'm Oscar Wilde, and I
Oscar Wilde (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 17:58
In reply to OooOooh nOooo, We are All in by anon (not verified)
I'm Oscar Wilde, and I endorse this message.
The good news is that if you
anon (not verified) Mon, 04/17/2023 - 19:32
In reply to Anarchist musicians must do by TranslationBVT (not verified)
The good news is that if you lose enough weight you can play your rib cage like a xylophone!
Nobody cares about musicians anymore. Not even anarchists. They are treated worse them dogs that poop in shoes.
It's not my problem
Tim Tue, 04/18/2023 - 10:15
In reply to Anarchist musicians must do by TranslationBVT (not verified)
It's not my problem "anarchist" musicians and writers only know how to make money through sources the state considers legit. It's a problem when attempting to use the state to enforce that against me.
Wut?
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 10:27
In reply to It's not my problem by Tim
Wut?
Look, I'm not going to lower myself by devaluing your very lucrative underground handjob career by saying you should be doing it for free. Nor am I going to mention how abelist your point about enforcement it. I will just say, however, that your attempt at justifying exploitation of others because you have determined that their work is without value is a little sus.
They're referring to the use
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 16:58
In reply to Wut? by anon (not verified)
They're referring to the use of the DMCA, which is, ya know, a law. You can have whatever shitty opinion you want about how paying for art should work, but to use the legal system to achieve your goals is pretty much by definition not anarchist, and pretty fucked up.
Look, simpy, the entire DMCA
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 17:36
In reply to They're referring to the use by anon (not verified)
Look, simpy, the entire DMCA thing is a red herring. Nobody, nobody is defending the usage of the DMCA. Calv even called it out because there was zero fucking mention of the DMCA in the original context. So quit with the bullshit DMCA misdirection, 'kay?
However, however!, there are some simp trolls all up in here defending exploiting and devaluing writers, artists, musicians 'cuz anarchism!
Plus everyone knows that starving anarchist musicians, writers, artists would never use the unacceptable DMCA (even if they are Amerikkkans) and instead would rely on the threatening brute force of the collective knee breakers which is toOoootally acceptable, rite brah?
Now fuck off back to your basement you boneless, unambitious troll.
It doesn't matter if it's a
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 17:57
In reply to Look, simpy, the entire DMCA by anon (not verified)
It doesn't matter if it's a red herring, if it was, you took the bait and pretended to not understand. You've made your point clear (albeit unconvincingly), we get it, if you have nothing new to say please move on. (And please stop with the "everyone who disagrees with me is a troll" cope, shit like that was cringe a decade ago, there's zero excuse for writing like that today.)
A shame the moderators are
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 20:03
In reply to It doesn't matter if it's a by anon (not verified)
A shame the moderators are deleting conversation.
It does matter. The whole thing matters to those affected (me included) but not to you who have no 'skin in the game' and site behind your screen as a 'tourist' to the topic and offer your bad opinion that artists should be exploited because you do not value art. For you do tell me to move on, me who this is life and death for, when you, who have nothing to lose or gain from it (other than more free art at the expense of others), is massively absurd and completely on the side of exploiters. How about you "move on" since this has nothing to do with you? Sound good, simpy?
Another poster here, Art
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 20:30
In reply to A shame the moderators are by anon (not verified)
Another poster here, Art should be free and everyone is an artist, is a creative individual. Entertainment begins in your own home and zone, it's not a commodity to impose at a cost upon other people and diminishes their own expressions by creating an elitist aesthetic about what art should be and valued. You "artistes" are not anarchs, you are posers seething with hubris!
1. We live in a society.
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 21:08
In reply to Another poster here, Art by anon (not verified)
1. We live in a society.
2. True anarchs don't need art they need to be digging latrines for the endless revolution!
Everyone is in a latrine but
anon (not verified) Tue, 04/18/2023 - 21:57
In reply to 1. We live in a society. by anon (not verified)
Everyone is in a latrine but some are looking at the stars!
Nothing says anarchy like
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 03:43
In reply to Everyone is in a latrine but by anon (not verified)
Nothing says anarchy like defending a legal concept that utilizes State violence to disrupt the free flow of knowledge and information for the purposes of rent extraction and protecting monopoly privileges. Two cheers for intellectual property laws!
When Luis Lingg was brought
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 03:52
In reply to Nothing says anarchy like by anon (not verified)
When Luis Lingg was brought before a judge during the Haymarket trial he denied throwing the bomb explaining that he couldn't have been the perpetrator because he was busy at home "filing DMCA's." Luis Lingg later blew his jaw off with a blasting cap and wrote "Hurrah for intellectual property" in blood on the wall of his prison cell before dying from his wounds
Intellectual property is
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 05:01
In reply to When Luis Lingg was brought by anon (not verified)
Intellectual property is knowledge theft!
Nobody is defending the DMCA
FuckYouPayMe (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 08:16
In reply to Intellectual property is by anon (not verified)
Nobody is defending the DMCA and nobody is defending intellectual property. You continue to be a toilet of red herring scented brainworms spinning out with attempted misdirection on the issue of exploitation of devalued creatives in anarchist milieus, screaming "make art for me for frrrREEEEE and receive nothing because you are worthless but I really really waAaaant it because I am boring and untalented!"
TAL is literally stealing
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 03:18
TAL is literally stealing from poc trans disabled veterans of the CHAZ. Everytime a white cracker anarchist clicks on the TAL or prints a zine it's stealing from my baby chuawawa's college fund. REAL anarchists pay for their books and zines and cash app me for my emotional labor
Tell us you're an out-of
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 08:21
In reply to TAL is literally stealing by anon (not verified)
Tell us you're an out-of-touch, reactionary, white man that just likes to download free stuff to hoard it next to their loli porn on their large collection of hard disks without explicitly saying it.
Tell us how downloading free
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 19:47
In reply to Tell us you're an out-of by anon (not verified)
Tell us how downloading free pdfs or even making them copyleft and freely accessible for download makes someone a White reactionary pedo. Bitch PLEASE!
OooOoooh yEeeees, it was the
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 21:39
In reply to Tell us how downloading free by anon (not verified)
OooOoooh yEeeees, it was the "downloading free pdfs and making them copyleft and freely accessible for download" part of your reactionary comment (it wasn't in your comment) that made one assume your shitty, reactionary position. OooOoooh who's the bitch now (it's you!)?!?
Which one?
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 22:52
In reply to OooOoooh yEeeees, it was the by anon (not verified)
Checkmate.
Crying "DMCA" then
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 21:42
In reply to Tell us how downloading free by anon (not verified)
Crying "DMCA" then "intellectual property" and now this--all things that were not even fucking said--so you can pretend to be a victim. You are such a delicate little troll.
Nobody NOBODY said downloading free pdfs or making them copyleft and freely accessible makes you a white reactionary pedo. Nobody said this, ya trollbaby.
Intellectual property <
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 03:24
Intellectual property < intellectual possessions
Learn the difference MANARCHISTS
"We’re basically a pop band
anon (not verified) Wed, 04/19/2023 - 09:02
"We’re basically a pop band with all the hooks and shit. The means is mass appeal - the end is mass revolt.
But get me right here, I’m talking about the musical output, not the culture of resistance we are a part of. I think we - the rock ‘n roll underground - have got a lot of things right in our organization and our ideals, but to consciously limit ourselves and be proud to be small, strange, and unapproachable is the totally wrong way to go - if we want to change the world, that is. "
Cue to gazillion cleancut normies listening to LOUD vocoded hiphop from their BMWs and young chicks twerking on TikTok...
Add new comment