ANews Podcast 471 – 6.12.26
 

Welcome to the ANews podcast. This podcast covers anarchist activity, ideas, and conversations from the previous week.

What’s New This Week
written by chisel and read by chisel and Generically Biblical White Boy Name

Topic of the Week: Accessibility & Exclusivity
with Madison and Blue

sound editing by Knicks in 5!
music samples:
Baha Men – Who Let the Dogs Out
Wu-Tang Clan – Wu‐Tang Clan Ain’t Nuthing ta F’ Wit
Ski Team – Thank You, Jalen Brunson

Comments

km (not verified) Mon, 06/15/2026 - 09:39

I'm only about 20 minutes into the totw convo and the thing about elitism in @ theory and philosophy is reminding me of (of all things) reading Elements of Refusal way back in 1990 and stumbling over the word/concept reification. I looked in the dictionary and it still did not make sense to me then. Over time though and with the desire to find out, eventually I got it. My point is that some ideas maybe should be difficult because the effort one makes to *get it* IS the actual point, innit. I have had the same problem with the term hermeneutics, though slowly I am learning.

in terms of telling non anarchists about anarchy the best way is to act non-hierarchically with people and let them understand viscerally how it is. then lay theory or philosophy on them, if they want some broader context. imho of course.

also, so far this discussion is great, thx.

km (not verified) Tue, 06/16/2026 - 09:19

In reply to by km (not verified)

Finished. I have some further thoughts: philosophy is a conversation that has been going on 1,000s of years, sure. no one will have perfect understanding of all of that, not even your college professors. The way I see it a lake is more than thousands of years old and you can jump in anywhere and get something from that, sure, not the whole of what that lake is but some knowledge. And like a lake, philosophy can be a shallow wade or a deep dive and both approaches have value. Learning to swim is a skill that requires effort as is philosophy.

moving on, is exclusivity being used where opacity might be more apt? because there are a ton of reasons to not lay all your shit out for just any fed to read/engage with. To me, exclude is an act, like to physically not allow someone in your space. whereas opacity is like making it hard to find your space, as it were. which is why I agree that depending upon why, exclusion can be authoritarian, but opacity is mostly common sense.

really, I had problems with what, exactly, was meant by particular words used in the totw, like accessibility, like who is against disability so much they're debating accessibility?? but of course something other was meant.

also, next time put the doggo on mic ;)

anonymous (not verified) Tue, 06/16/2026 - 15:30

In reply to by km (not verified)

Futurism reports:
in a new essay for The Chronicle Higher Education, university-level literature and writing instructor Tyler Jagt recalls how not a single one of his students could get through an assigned 20-page article, something that he had read "without complaint" as an undergraduate a decade ago.

One student confessed that the reason they didn't finish was that they kept losing track of what the paper was about. And there's no doubt that they're not alone. Jagt cites the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress reading assessment results released last year. It showed that 12th grade reading scores were at the lowest level since the assessment began in 1992. Nearly a third of those 12th graders scored below the assessment's "basic" level in reading, meaning they likely "cannot draw general conclusions based on concepts presented explicitly in a text." Younger children aren't better off: a recent report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation found that 70 percent of fourth graders, or around two million kids, can't read at a proficient level.

"What I am seeing in my classroom is no longer a hunch," Jagt writes. "There is a measurable, generational collapse in sustained reading and writing, and the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul it requires...." Jagt cites an MIT study that found users who used ChatGPT during cognitive tasks like writing essays showed lower brain activity in areas associated with creativity compared to students who only used a traditional Google Search or didn't lookup information at all. An astonishing 83 percent of the AI users couldn't quote a single line from the essays they had just written, and capstoning the alarm, the brain activity in the AI users didn't return to normal when they were later asked to write without AI...

On our pernicious pocket devices, Jagt touted a 2017 study that found that simply having a smartphone physically nearby — even if it's face down or turned off — reduced available cognitive capacity and impaired cognitive functioning. "So when a student tells me they 'kept losing track' of a 20-page article, I have to acknowledge that they may be describing a measurable neurological condition," Jagt wrote. "The neural pathways that support sustained attention are built by use, and they atrophy without it. Your body is a use-it-or-lose-it system, and the brain is no exception."

Sunday an "Ask Reddit" question went viral — drawing over 11,000 upvotes — for its question to any teachers reading Reddit. "Is the 'Gen Alpha can't read (write, or do math ext)' crisis real? If so how bad is it?" Some responses...

   "The run of the mill non-honors kids have gotten really bad," posted one high school teacher. "Very low tolerance for working hard, very short attention span, very short stamina for active listening... It's the group that is the most worrying because a decade ago, I'd estimate that maybe 10-20% of kids at a school are like this, and now it's probably 40-50% of each graduating class... Then there's of course the bottom 10-20% kids (excluding the special ed/severe/moderate learning disability kids). This is what the viral videos are about and it's not an exaggeration. They can't read, write, or do very basic math like multiplication or division as a 17 year old."

   "This is the first year the MAJORITY of my class cheated on their first essays...." posted one high school English teacher. "It was also the first year a kid yelled 'We don't care about your fucking books, Miss!' while I was in front of the class presenting books they might be interested in for their book reviews... Almost all of them cheated on the book eview thy had to write."

via Slash Dot https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/06/14/2227254/are-many-college-students-losing-the-ability-to-read

Lock Picker (not verified) Tue, 06/16/2026 - 08:27

The discussion of accessibility was very thoughtful. It reminded me that before I ever had a college degree, I loved dense theory and wanted to discuss it. Usually more than people with degrees. I also believe that we should be "exclusive" on matters of security culture & counter-repression.

There is also a tendency in above-ground activist groups to use accessibility as a wedge for more insidious things like democratic mass movements/populism. We can have spaces where we mentor newcomers without compromising our values and desires.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
B
7
3
e
j
k
S
(
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.