Repression and Resistance in Russia

From CrimethInc.

An Overview

Across three decades, Russia has been at the forefront of the worldwide descent into authoritarianism. Vladimir Putin’s government has suppressed opposition in ways that aspiring autocrats like Donald Trump are still striving to emulate. Yet despite widespread repression, there is still resistance in Russia, and as Putin’s model proliferates, people everywhere around the world stand to benefit from learning about it. Likewise, we should support Russian anarchist and anti-war prisoners, both because resistance within Russia offers hope for the eventual end of war and totalitarianism and because, should autocrats consolidate power where we live, we will wish for people to support us, as well.

The following text is based on a presentation Antti Rautiainen offered at the Baltic Anarchist Book Fair in Tartu on May 30, 2026. You can watch a video of the presentation here or listen to it via Spotify. The above photograph shows the consequences of an action carried out by the anarchist Ruslan Sidiki.


In Russia, street protests against the war were crushed in 2022, the first year following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. According to the human rights organization OVD Info, 18,901 arrests for anti-war protests in year 2022 were followed by 274 arrests in 2023, 41 arrests in 2022, and just 13 arrests in first half of the year 2025. The reason for this sharp decline was the “Ilya Dadin” law of 2014, according to which “repeated offenses in following the established organization of protests” across a period of 180 days can result a prison sentence of up to 5 years. Thousands of people were arrested once or twice for taking part in anti-war street activities in 2022 and received either a fine or a prison sentence of a few days—but few risked being arrested for a third time.

Detentions for anti-war actions by year, first half of 2025, according to OVD-Info.

Russian polls have been unreliable since spring 2022. After the criminalization of anti-war opinions, some polling companies reported that up to 60% of people queried refused to give answers. Before the polls became unreliable, 58-71% of Russians indicated a pro-war sentiment in various polls. However, opinions were intensely polarized between different groups. People in major cities were more anti-war than those in other locations; younger people were more anti-war, as were women. The greatest division was between people who watch television, the chief propaganda tool of the state, and people who do not watch it. Among people less than 30 years old who do not watch television, 80% were anti-war.

The general impression among critical Russians is that the majority of those in Russia still share a pro-war sentiment. However, a shift is visible even in officially tolerated opinion polls. According to polls by the Levada Center, over the past two years, the share of Russians supporting the continuation of the war effort has dropped from around 41% to around 28%, and share of those who support peace talks has grown from 51% to 62%. At the same time, the number of those who support making concessions to Ukraine is at 24%: people want peace, but on terms favorable to Russia.

Of course, this may simply reflect what people are willing to say to anonymous pollsters.

Another difference is that now, people in small cities and rural localities are expressing more anti-war sentiment than those in major urban centers. Moscow is the most pro-war city. The likely explanation is that most of the frontline casualties are from small, peripheral communities.

Factors Undermining the Anti-War Movement

Why, after more than four years of war, with more than a million Russian soldiers wounded or dead, is anti-war sentiment still confined to a minority?

As the saying goes, “It’s the economy, stupid.” During the first years of the war, salaries were growing even with high inflation rate. Starting in 2004, the Russian ruling class hoarded huge profits of the oil and gas trade in a fund currently known as the “National Wealth Fund.” Instead of raising the standard of living by investing in healthcare, social benefits and services, and the like, the money was stashed to be spent on wars and militarization. Now these billions are finally flowing into the economy in the form of wartime investment. The unemployment rate is negligible; in some cases, salaries have multiplied at factories in regions that were previously economically depressed. Generous monthly payments for contract soldiers are up to five times the average salary in poorer regions. At the same time, payments to widows and orphans are shifting the economy in the most destitute areas of the Russian federation, from which most of the enlisted soldiers come.

During the first months of 2026, the Russian economy contracted for the first time since the beginning of the war; but now, once again, it is on a growth trajectory, due to the oil price hike following the war in Iran. The Russian state budget is running on a deficit due to the costs of the war, but there are plenty of ways to solve that issue, such as tax increases, using what remains of the National Wealth Fund, cutting social spending and education, and forcing oligarchs to buy state obligations. The Russian economy will likely be able to sustain the war for several years yet, although the standard of living is stagnating now and drone strikes are causing increasing inconvenience.

Another factor explaining Russian support for the war is the situation on the frontline. Russia’s advances have been very slow for years, but most weeks, Russia is still gaining more territory than it is losing. The traditional dream of socialists of all stripes is that soldiers will turn their rifles against the ruling class and finish the war. But throughout world history, this usually takes place in a situation in which a war has already been lost, as in Russia in February 1917 and Germany in November 1918. It is not certain that Russia will win this war, but as long as the chances are high, many people would like to be on the winning side.

The third factor is that for a random person, the risk of ending up in the war remains low. The independent media project Mediazona, originally established by members of Pussy Riot, has been tracking Russian losses by monitoring social media and other sources, and they have been able dig up information about 239,000 dead at the front. Of these casualties, the service branch of 22.5% of the casualties is unknown. 36.7% are volunteers, 11% are inmates, 21.5% are contract soldiers, and only 8.3% are mobilized soldiers. Some of the volunteers, inmates, and contract soldiers have not signed their contracts voluntarily; inmates and conscripts are pressured to sign contracts. But the vast majority of them had a choice, and even those mobilized often had the option of not appearing in the enlistment office and leaving the country or dodging the draft by other means. Few people who have died in the front have genuinely used every means at their disposal to avoid this.

Also, many of those who would otherwise have opposed the war have left Russia. The exodus that took place in 2022 involved up to 700,000 people. Many of them have returned due to the difficulties of life in emigration, but emigration is continuing.

At the same time, the intensity of the repression targeting anti-war opinion is without precedent since the beginning of Perestroika in 1986.

From Protests to Direct Action

Yet there are still protests and social movements. Activatica is a project monitoring protests in Russia, and they are tracking several hundred protests and direct actions every month. The most popular topics are environmental issues; anti-repression events, such as letter writing events for political prisoners, are still tolerated. Activatica lists much fewer anti-war protests, and those are usually direct actions. In a few cities, lone pickets of stubborn pensioners are still occasionally tolerated without a resulting prison sentence, such as the pickets by Viktor Gilin in Perm.

Protests and direct actions by type, monthly, year 2025, according to Activatica.

The number of anti-war direct actions actually appears to be growing. In 2024, Activatica recorded 145 actions; in 2025, 233 actions. Activatica tries not to count actions provoked by Ukrainian internet scammers, who hack the bank accounts of (usually elderly) persons, then blackmail them into carrying direct actions, which often result in severe sentences. The internet scamming industry is widespread in Ukraine, and it is contributing to the war effort in this dubious way, perhaps also as a consequence of its links to Ukrainian security services.

Direct actions by region, 2024, according to Activatica.

Direct actions by Russian region, 2025, according to Activatica.

However, Activatica does not attempt to differentiate between actions carried out by activists and Ukrainian secret services—which is challenging in any case, because the secret services occasionally masquerade as activists. One may assume that actions involving explosives that occur not far from the Ukrainian border, or professional-level assassinations of Russian officers in major cities, are unlikely to be the efforts of activists, whereas small-scale Molotov cocktail attacks far from the frontline are probably the work of activists. Often, it is difficult to be sure who is behind what. Moreover, it is possible that people who genuinely oppose the war are contacting Ukrainian secret services in order to solve their own financial problems, or in order to combine their financial and a political interests. The model of Ukrainian secret service hiring civilians for money might be described as “Sabotage as Service”—the same model that is widely used by the Russian secret services in Ukraine and around Europe.

Oil storage facilities burned in Kandry, Bashkokorstan, in an action claimed by Rospartisan on May 26, 2026. Rospartisan has a big-tent policy of covering any anti-war direct actions, from anarchists to the far-right.

The vast majority of small-scale sabotage actions are not claimed by any group. During the first years of the war, the Combat Organization of Anarcho-Communists (BOAK) succeeded in conducting several major sabotage actions. BOAK was established before the 2022 invasion; it represents the direct continuation of the wave of insurrectionary anarchism that occurred in Russia from 2008-2013, inspired by the uprising in Greece in December 2008 after the police murdered Alexandros Grigoropoulos. Among the founders of the organization was Dmitry Petrov, an anarchist from Moscow who was killed by Russian forces while defending Ukraine in 2023.

The logo of the Combat Organization of Anarcho-Communists.

No one that the authorities have caught has been proven to be a BOAK activist. In one case, the authorities claimed that they had arrested a BOAK member for carrying out direct action, but an anarchist political prisoner who was held in the same prison confirmed that the activist had nothing to do with BOAK or anarchism. The case of another person who was arrested last year and accused of being a BOAK member still awaits confirmation or refutation, due to the secrecy of the court materials. BOAK cannot confirm or refute such claims because it does not preserve the personal details of its contacts.

A photograph from a BOAK action.

A photograph from a BOAK action.

But although BOAK members have been able to evade the Russian authorities, several have been forced to flee Russia or to tone down their activities. This has largely reduced BOAK to a propaganda organization promoting direct action and anarchism.

Organizations Supporting Anarchist and Direct-Action Prisoners

Anarchists have established several organizations to support anarchists facing repression. Currently, the oldest is the Anarchist Black Cross of Moscow, established in 2003. For more than two decades, ABC Moscow has supported repressed anarchists, anti-fascists, anti-authoritarians and their supporters. As of now, ABC Moscow lists 23 anarchist and anti-fascist political prisoners in Russia, of whom 14 are in prison for alleged actions against industry or the military. Most of the rest were imprisoned prior to the full-scale invasion in 2022. During the first years of the war, ABC Moscow spread information about and supported diverse anti-war direct-action prisoners, but lately, their efforts have been confined to supporting anarchist and anti-authoritarian prisoners, due to the sheer number of anti-war prisoners.

In 2025, ABC Moscow (and all the other ABC groups) were declared “undesirable” in Russia, which means that donating to them can result in a three-year prison sentence. Eventually, ABC Moscow moved all of its activities and members abroad; today, it focuses on spreading information and raising funds outside Russia. News about ABC Moscow activity appears regularly on the Avtonom website and via the group’s own Telegram channel. ABC Moscow can receive donations via Paypal and cryptocurrencies.

As ABC Moscow’s activities inside Russia have become impossible, another organization has emerged to support anarchist and anti-authoritarian prisoners, named Fires of Freedom. You can follow its Russian-language Telegram channel here.

Fires of Freedom.

Solidarity Zone is another initiative started by anti-authoritarians to support anti-war direct action prisoners of various political convictions (excluding the far right). It was established in 2022, at a time when mainstream human rights organizations were not willing to support those sentenced for arsons and “terrorist” charges. Since then, the situation has changed; now, Russian opposition and human rights organizations have a more positive attitude towards direct action. However, Solidarity Zone is still providing support for 15 prisoners serving lengthy sentences for allegedly carrying out direct action, and the organization is following the cases of many more.

Solidarity Zone.

Although the mainstream democratic opposition has become more supportive of prisoners accused of direct action, in practice, the sheer number of prisoners has overwhelmed all prisoner support structures. The most significant Russian human rights organization, Memorial, has declared 1715 prisoners to be political, of whom 674 are anti-war prisoners. It has also listed 5608 people with “politically motivated charges.” Their process of identifying political prisoners has been slowed down severely by the number of cases. For example, Memorial designated the anarchist Alexandr Snezhkov as a political prisoner only two years after his case was submitted to them. In reality, the number of political prisoners in Russia is probably twice as many as they list.

The growth of the number of political prisoners in Russia from 2012-2025, according to Memorial. Graph by Riddle.

In the first half of 2026, 1234 people were sentenced for “terrorism” (including incitement)—an increase of 38% compared with the first half of 2025. The median prison sentence was 13 years. By the end of 2025, there were 5412 prisoners in Russia with “terrorism” charges, an annual growth of 40.9%. This number includes Ukrainian prisoners of war, who are routinely charged with ”terrorism,” sabotage as a service, provocateur victims etc. Motivations may also overlap.

Altogether, 21,600 people are listed as “terrorists and extremists” on the blacklist of the Rosfinmonitoring, the Russian Federal Service of Financial Monitoring. In addition to prisoners, this list includes people whose sentences expired long ago, and people who have emigrated. Ending up on this list means a lifetime ban on receiving almost any bank services. In practice, those on the list can only earn a living in cash.

Although supporting political prisoners has been a top priority for the Russian opposition, the avalanche of cases has caused prisoner support structures to collapse, and political prisoners have been reduced to statistics. More and more political prisoners have to face court without any financial support or lawyers.

At this point, it is also worth asking what the point of such support even is, as no charges against political prisoners have been thrown out as a consequence of the efforts of lawyers, no matter how skillful. The outcome of every case has been decided long before they make it to the court. Nonetheless, lawyers provide a critical—albeit expensive—means of communicating with prisoners during the periods of investigation. Often, the authorities have stopped torturing prisoners after lawyers have become involved in their cases.

Legal work sometimes secures some minor victories. For example, in summer 2023, Ivan Kudryashov, who was supported by Solidarity Zone while imprisoned for putting up anti-war posters in his hometown of Tver, won a hunger strike after 40 days, gaining the promise that he would have access to vegan food and vitamins sent to him in parcels. Viktor Filinkov, who was arrested in January 2018 and sentenced to seven years in prison on the accusation of being a member of a supposed underground anarchist “Network,” was repeatedly placed in solitary confinement in his prison colony. But with help of lawyers, he managed to challenge these policies and spent last years of his imprisonment in general population.

Ivan Kurdyashov.

An Incomplete List of Anarchists and Anti-Authoritarians in Russian Prisons and Prisoner Camps for Opposing the War

Dmitri Syutkin is a young anarchist, and as many of the younger anarchists, encountered with anarchist ideas online and was rather isolated from the anarchist movement. He is from a small city in the Sverdlovsk region, and he maintained a small telegram channel advocating anarchism and independent Ural region. Three years ago, at the age of 17, he was entrapped by the FSB, who deceived him, claiming to represent Russian volunteers fighting in Ukraine. Anarchist prisoner support groups only became aware of him this year. Accused of terrorism and other charges, he may face up to 10 years in prison.

Dmitri Syutkin.

Another anarchist prisoner who was discovered relatively recently is Alexey Grigorev from Novotroitsk in the Orenburg region. Accused of planning to burn an FSB building and military recruiting center and of having contact with the Ukrainian authorities, he was sentenced to 20 years in prison in February 2025, before any prisoner support group learned of his case.

Alexey Grigorev.

Perhaps the most successful of the lone anarchist partisans is Ruslan Sidiki, who, unlike the prisoners listed above, had connection with the anarchist movement, having been active in a small and longstanding anarchist rural commune in the Leningrad area, close to St. Petersburg. He attempted to use drones to destroy strategic bombers, but failed as a consequence of electronic jammers. A second action against freight train was more successful, completely derailing a train transporting chemical ingredients. However, due to a small mistake, Ruslan was caught following a massive manhunt and sentenced to 29 years in prison in May 2025. This year, Ruslan’s lawyer was arrested, but Fires of Freedom managed to raise funds to pay for new lawyer to file his appeal.

Ruslan Sidiki visiting the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in better times.

Alexey Rozhkov, another lone anarchist partisan, was one of the first people to attack military enlistment offices. He attempted an attack with Molotov cocktails on March 11, 2022, just two weeks after the war began. He was soon arrested, but because minor sabotage did not yet result in automatic terrorist charges during the first months of the war, he was released pending court and escaped to Kyrgysztan. Unfortunately, he was kidnapped there, brought back to Russia, tortured, and charged with terrorism. In May 2026, he received a sentence of 16 years in prison.

Alexey Rozhkov

Eventually, this and other actions against enlistment offices inspired a massive wave of arson attacks. Mediazone listed 94 such attacks during the first year and a half of the war. During that early phase of the war, many enlistment offices did not have their files digitized, so burning an office could protect everyone from an urban neighbourhood or rural region from being sent to war for several months. Eventually, the authorities began a hurried effort to digitize all the conscript files; although actions against enlistment offices still occasionally take place, the value of the target is now doubtful. Currently, most anti-war sabotage is targeted against transport and energy infrastructure such as railroads.

Alexey Rozhkov with Molotov Cocktail. CCTV camera footage, scan from print of the court documents.

Arson attacks against military enlistment offices and other administrative buildings during the first year of the war, according to Mediazona. Blue signifies before the August mobilization, orange signifies after.

Currently, the most significant case against anarchists is the Tyumen case, which is still in court. Six anarchists from Yekaterinburg in the Ural region and Tyumen and Surgut of Siberia are accused of establishing a clandestine anarchist organization. In August 2022, Kirill Brik and Deniz Aydin were arrested in a forest in Tyumen, allegedly while attempting to test explosives. Arrests followed in Yekaterinburg and Surgut. All of the arrestees were brutally tortured; they confessed, but eventually all of them except Kirill Brik recanted their testimony. Still, with a cooperating witness, the situation of the others accused is dire. Nikita Oleynik, the founder of the anarchist library Burevestnik (“Storm Petrel”) in Surgut, is accused of being “a leader of a terrorist group” and is in a danger of receiving a life sentence.

The life sentence was introduced in Russia in 1992 as a replacement for the death penalty. For 34 years, no one with a life sentence has ever been released in Russia. The other defendants in the Tyumen case face up to 25 years in prison each.

Deniz Aidyn.

Yuri Neznamov.

Danil Chertykov.

Nikita Oleynik.

Roman Paklin.

Aleksandr Snezhkov and Lyubov Lizunova were arrested in Chita in the far east of Russia in October 2022, while only 19 and 16 years old. Allegedly, they painted graffiti reading ”Death to the regime.” They were also suspected of administering a Telegram channel with anarchist and anti-war messages. Snezhkov was sentenced to six years in prison and Lizunova to three and a half years in April 2024. This year, Aleksandr received an additional sentence for “incitement” because he allegedly read his legal papers to other prisoners; he has been sent to a stricter prison for the remaining two years of his sentence.

Lyubov Lizunova and Aleksandr Snezhkov.

Solidarity Zone tracked down the anarchist Roman Shvedov in the court system in autumn 2024. He was accused of anti-war arson. However, he refused the support that Solidarity Zone offered, insisting that there was nothing that could be done for him and emphasizing that he would prefer for the resources to be directed to other victims of repression. After being sentenced to 16 years in prison, he committed suicide in a Rostov jail in December 2024. The face of this fallen anarchist comrade remains unknown to us. Solidarity groups do not even have a proper photograph of him, only a pixelated face from Russian mainstream media.

Roman Shvedov.

What Can Those Abroad Do for Russian Anarchist Prisoners?

The most straightforward way to act in solidarity with Russian prisoners is by spreading information—for example, translating news and carrying out banner drops, graffiti, and other forms of direct actions. A great deal of news about Russian anarchist prisoners is available on the English section of the website of Autonomous Action, the former Russian Libertarian Communist federation, which is now working as a media project.

The logo of Autonomous Action.

With automatic translation tools available for free online, it is easy to write letters even when the prison censors only allow prisoners to receive letters in Russian. It is possible to write to a number of anarchist prisoners via the prisonmail.online service at a small cost; the service also provides the opportunity to receive replies. It is possible to write other prisoners via snail mail. A full list of addresses is available via the ABC Moscow website.

Prisoner solidarity groups are in constant need of funds to pay for lawyers and other costs of imprisonment. You can donate to fundraising campaigns and projects that support prisoners—Anarchist Black Cross of Moscow, Fires of Freedom, and Solidarity Zone.

It is also possible to donate to direct action initiatives such as BOAK using cryptocurrency. Last but not least, you cansupport the anarchists of Belarus (such as the Anarchist Black Cross of Belarus and Pramen) and Ukraine (such as Solidarity Collectives). All three countries are now locked in a common struggle against war and Russian authoritarian imperialism.

Comments

bonanno (not verified) Tue, 09/15/2026 - 11:14

this is cia colonial propaganda: Russian authoritarian imperialism. take care about your trump gangster colonialism and bombing children.

we will never trust to cia snitches who sell story, they are anarchists.
this article misuse anarchists to kiss cia in the ass, and "we should be stupid to make banner cia propaganda".

i dont give a shit for fictive organisation that make statistic and monitor russia about human rights and this or that, those liberal ngo monkeys are not anarchists and cannot be trusted.

shortly, usa developed pervert colonial strategy: part of that is propaganda and cia bots flood the internet even at anarchists websites, but they dont dare to call to bomb russian embassies than just drop a banner to kiss cia in the ass. hahaha. if this is really crimethink, they are cia monkeys pretending to be against the war...

Ant anarch (not verified) Tue, 09/15/2026 - 22:39

In reply to by bonanno (not verified)

Various anarchist organization resemble the 'ant mill', An ant mill is an observed phenomenon in which a group of army ants, separated from the main foraging party, lose the pheromone track and begin to follow one another, forming a continuously rotating circle. This circle is commonly known as a “death spiral” because the ants might eventually die of exhaustion. It has been reproduced in laboratories and in ant colony simulations.
When anarchist groups are seperated from their foundational values and ideas (their cognitive pheronomes) and adopt a regional scent (nationalist parochialisms), they enter the death spiral of conformity and obedience to the dominant hierarchy, and become shells of their former selves.

bonanno (not verified) Tue, 09/15/2026 - 11:18

ooo my god, ukrainian secret service...
https://www.solidaritycollectives.org/en/projects-military/
Since the beginning of the war, our primary mission has been to supply anti-authoritarian activists who joined military units with everything they need. With the donations collected, we have purchased and delivered over a hundred level 4 body armor vests, dozens of helmets, night vision devices, thermal imagers, rangefinders, drones, tactical medical supplies, military uniforms, boots, clothing, and much more—both specialized and general-use equipment. Today, the “Solidarity Collectives” regularly support up to 150 fighters, some of whom are on the front lines.

Wayne@ (not verified) Tue, 09/15/2026 - 19:44

In reply to by bonanno (not verified)

Virtually all the anarchists I know and read are against Russian dictatorship, capitalism, and imperialism, even as they oppose that of the US and its allies. There *is* an argument among anarchists about whether to support the Ukrainians fighting back against the Russian army, and (if so) how anarchists should take part in the fight. But everyone feels that *Russian* anarchists should oppose *their* state's aggression, through draft evasion, sabotage, propaganda, and so on. Where Bananno is coming from is beyond me.

bonanno (not verified) Wed, 09/16/2026 - 00:03

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

anarchists should never take part in any war on any side in the war and this is not about russian anarchists than about american cia fake anarchists calling us to give donations to ukrainian military spies like this solidarity collective that has also western adventure mercenaries, or even they call us to travel to participate in the war...
already seen in syria and yugoslavia, isis used facebook to recruit western muslims to travel to syria to fight against assad. even during the war in yougoslavia (croatia, bosnia, kosovo), many fighters are in fact brought from abroad to participate in the war, crimethinc is doing the same job as cia-facebook for isis.

anarchists in russia are just misused for psycho manipulaton by the cia and nato members military spies including ukranan miltary secret service, we should have feelings for our brothers and give donation or participate in colonal propaganda or even travel in the war to shoot russians. that's the point of the story and not anarchists in russia.

Wayne@ (not verified) Wed, 09/16/2026 - 12:28

In reply to by bonanno (not verified)

I think it is pretty clear to anyone who reads Bonanno's Comments that they are criticizing Russian anarchists for their opposition to Russian imperialist war against Ukraine.

Ghost Dog (not verified) Wed, 09/16/2026 - 01:08

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

Wayne, maybe get your own house in order before telling Russian anarchos what to do. You’re getting slapped up by overweight ICE agents and declaring victory when they stop shooting your people by the way.

Wayne@ (not verified) Wed, 09/16/2026 - 12:33

In reply to by Ghost Dog (not verified)

Ghost Dog condemns me for "telling Russian anarchos what to do." What I am "telling them to do" is to oppose the Russian state's imperialist war against Ukraine. In other words, to be anarchists. (This is what they are already doing, much to Bonanno's dislike.)

Debater (not verified) Wed, 09/16/2026 - 08:29

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

No, there is no argument about whether to support Ukrainians fighting the Russian army, there is a debate about whether to support the Ukrainian state army fighting the Russian state army, and whether to support the arms companies and armies of NATO states and Israel as they arm Ukraine, which is itself a colonial state according to its own constitution (there are Indigenous peoples whose territory is occupied/dominated by the Ukrainian state and its predominantly Ukrainian ethnicity), not to mention that Ukraine is also an imperialist state beyond its own colonial holdings, arming the Gulf monarchies to aid Israeli and American aggression and attacking an Iranian commercial vessel itself also to aid that same aggression, voting at the UN in favor of the US blockade against Cuba, and formerly arming Myanmar even as it committed genocide.

Wayne@ (not verified) Wed, 09/16/2026 - 12:52

In reply to by Debater (not verified)

Debater prefers not to criticize Bonanno for opposing Russian anarchists who resist the Russian invasion. Instead D. focuses on the side issue (in this exchange) about whether to support Ukrainians and, if so, how.

D. writes, "Ukraine is also an imperialist state," because its state has allied itself with Western imperialism. This alliance (due to being attacked and oppressed by Russian imperialism) should be condemned by anarchists, as we oppose the Ukrainian state and capitalism altogether. But it does not make Ukraine "imperialist," by definition. Otherwise every (non-imperialist) state in the world would be "imperialist" since almost all line up with one imperialism or another.

Debater declares, "there is no argument about whether to support Ukrainians fighting the Russian army, there is a debate about whether to support the Ukrainian state army fighting the Russian state army,"

The problem with this argument is that the only force of Ukrainians which is fighting the invading Russians *is* the Ukrainian state army. This is too bad but there it is. Either anarchists are in solidarity with soldiers in this army or they do not fight the invaders. That is reality. Even if they had an independent guerrilla/militia revolutionary force, they would still have to turn their guns in the same direction as the regular army: against the imperialist invaders. (That is, until the day they gain enough support to overturn the Ukrainian state.)

Debater (not verified) Thu, 09/17/2026 - 12:20

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

Ukraine's own constitution admits to it being a colonial state (that there are Indigenous peoples within its borders). A state cannot be colonial without being imperialist, because colonialism is a particular form or manifestation of imperialism.

Ukraine is also not imperialist simply because it aligns itself with imperialist states, and I made no such claim. Ukraine is imperialist because of what it itself does, colonizes peoples within its own borders, invades and occupies Iraq, sells arms to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf monarchies, buys arms from Turkey and Israel, and votes in favor of the blockade of Cuba.

Or are you arguing that the Ukrainian state and its arms companies have zero agency of their own? A strange argument if it's supposed to mean that Ukraine is not imperialist but instead a valiant fighter against imperialism. That argument would actually mean that Ukraine is merely a puppet of American, Israeli and Turkish imperialism. Not that I expect you to actually think through your own arguments.

Wayne@ (not verified) Thu, 09/17/2026 - 17:02

In reply to by Debater (not verified)

Debater refuses to discuss the imperialist aggression of the Russian state and resistance to it by Russian anarchists. This was, after all, the topic of the original essay and of the first Comments (by someone who denounced the Russian anarchists from a "campist" perspective).

The Indigenous people of Ukraine are especially the Crimean Tartars. Under Stalin, they were treated very badly, forced to leave Crimea and re-settle elsewhere. After Stalin, they have been allowed to return. Under the Ukrainian government they have been treated much better, if not perfectly. Polls show that they do not want Crimea to merge with Russia but prefer Ukraine. In short, their existence does not show that Ukraine is "imperialist," as Debater claims.

I did not claim "that Ukraine is not imperialist but instead a valiant fighter against imperialism." For one thing, I distinguish between "Ukraine" the capitalist state and "Ukraine" the people (mostly workers, farmers, and the oppressed). As I wrote, I do not support many things that state does. But I support the Ukrainian people's right to be free of Russian imperialist aggression and occupation. As do the Russian anarchists.

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 01:55

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

>The Indigenous people of Ukraine are especially the Crimean Tatars
How conveniently you forgot the Russians, Greeks, Jews, Hungarians, Rusyns, and Poles. Oh, sorry—I forgot that the Poles were wiped out.

>Under the Ukrainian government they have been treated much better, if not perfectly
When, exactly? Was it when the Ukrainian government refused to recognize Tatar self-governance organizations as legitimate, or when it bulldozed Tatar settlements?

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 07:33

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

"The Indigenous people of Ukraine are especially the Crimean Tartars. "

Nnnnnoope.

This demonstrates how political narratives are twisting history to their own ends. The Tatar were Turkic tribes of of the Golden Horde, i.e. the imperialist Khanate, that are known to have colonized the Crimean peninsula around the 13th-14th centuries during the Mongol invasions.

The Kievan Rus, or the original Russian society, had been around there since the 9th century. Ergo, they were colonized by the Mongol empire, of which the Tatar were the agents.

If you want a real indigenous population in the area, if you can't consider the Rus as such, then there were the Scytians, who may still have existed back then, but are of no political relevance today as they have long disappeared as a culture or even ethnic group.

But all of this is inconvenient to that comic book anti-imperialist narrative of "yours", tho. I know that sux!!! But that's what happens when you seek out the truth, instead of validation for made-up narratives.

Here's two options: either you accept the modern -and "post-truth"- realization that *there are no truths* but relativistic, contextualized constructs of meaning that apply only to specific interests, which thinly hides a complete Dyonesian ontological nihilism... where anything goes, as far as "reality" and values; ooor, you go with a postmodern approach that seeks to reinstate the value of truth by investigating and coldly accept truths -"any truths", as Mad Neech would say- as foundations for building a worldview.

I'm seeing the second option as much more stimulating and rewarding.

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 09/19/2026 - 10:29

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

indigenous sovereignty politics is blood and soil nationalism with a contrarian sheen to allow the left to more easily digest it. i realize this causes certain people who love moralistic “anti-racist/anti-imperialist” activism to have absolute fits, but see the entire history of zionism for a great example, or more recently the ethnic cleansing perpetrated in rojava, or like the entire history of modern nationalism i guess , which arose intertwined with capitalism as the ideology of bourgeois-led revolutions against feudalism, and of every counterrevolutionary movement since… there’s no “good” nationalism, “anticapitalist/antiimperialist” nationalism ; no anarchist should be really confused about that but many are left activists with different aesthetics (just as you could say many leftists are liberals with different aesthetics/rhetorics/tactics or as gillis admits in another recent piece, anarchists like him may share the same values are liberals)

sorry i don’t care where you or anyone else’s ancestors lived anymore than i care about your assigned sex at birth , disability status or any other politicized marker that people can’t help. it’s always regressive. it’s convenient fodder for all sorts of horrific politics and violence and it’s totally unnecessary for explaining why colonialism (or patriarchy or etc) are destructive and unjust

Debater (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 07:39

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

Just because I'm discussing Ukrainian colonialism/imperialism doesn't mean I refuse to discuss Russian aggression or imperialism. That doesn't follow at all, and two imperialisms don't cancel each other out and never have. When Russia sold Alaska to America, Russia didn't cease to be colonialist/imperialist, just as when Belgium was invaded by Germany, Belgium didn't give up the Congo and cease to be colonialist/imperialist, just as Russia invading Ukraine doesn't make Ukraine not colonialist/imperialist.

If Ukraine treated Crimean Tatars better than the USSR did, this does nothing to absolve Ukraine of colonialism/imperialism. America has treated Indigenous people better than Canada has with regard to Indigenous child welfare over the past few decades. That does not turn America anti-colonialist.

Ukraine refused to adopt UNDRIP and refused to recognize Crimean Tatars as Indigenous or redress their oppression until Russia had already taken Ukraine, until it was too late. Some Crimean Tatar leaders are open that they preferred Ukraine to Russia, that they supported Ukraine, but they are also open that this support was NOT reciprocated by Ukraine towards them! Ukraine is still by definition colonialist and imperialist and you take a position to the right of the current Ukrainian government and the UN if you disagree.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160625095340/http://www.iccrimea.org/repo…

https://iccrimea.org/scholarly/indigenous.html

anonymous (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 05:47

In reply to by Debater (not verified)

Don't you think conditions will be better for both peoples' lives and for revolution without the imposition of Russian rule? The Russian state seems like a far more counterrevolutionary force than the Ukrainian state to me

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 09/19/2026 - 10:17

In reply to by anonymous (not verified)

genuinely, how do you fucking figure? this may seem obvious if you are addicted to the left/liberal media sphere and its undying commitment to capitalist democracy, the hellish system both “sides” are part of while the poor and working classes are sent to die for their glorious causes. but no i dont think so. i dont support capitalism or nationalism in any flavor. why do YOU think so? what is your reasoning? it’s on you to defend why you’re making this assertion , before you think of asking me to elaborate further…

baby in the ba… (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 07:03

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

wayne, i don’t understand how the campism of states you aptly oppose is really different from the autonomous campism you endorse through word games, supporting “anarchists”(?) fighting the fascist russian state in the army of the fascist ukrainian state. just because you say you’re only supporting the “people”(nation?) or “the anarchists” it amounts to the same thing. why would you support revolutionary defeatism in russia but not in ukraine - because it’s a “war of aggression”, because there is “international law” that protects the “rights” of states? what kind of anarchist believe in drivel like that? because russian state is doing more damage to ukrainian civilians than vice versa? but they are both doing plenty of harm to everyone and it’s a question of principle - anarchists are supposed to be anti statist.

i don’t mean to accuse you of anything but i do find it curious that you have such a stalwart obsession with defending the “ukrainian people” alongside the many fascist as well as liberal forces supporting the ukrainian state, that you often speak of bakunin while hand waving off his noxious anti semitism, or that you’ve never seriously spoken (in my knowledge) to the object lesson in “national liberation” that the history of zionism presents (other than i’m sure to say that israel had and genocide bad). in the old days there were plenty of leftists and even anarchists who supported zionism for the dignity of the jewish people. a worthy goal but look how it turned out. yet we’re still running the same plays for every country in a new capitalist war, ukraine palestine whatever. why? just to look up to date with the latest activist causes and not because we actually care about our so called ideology and principles???

Wayne@ (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 14:58

In reply to by baby in the ba… (not verified)

Dear Baby-in-the-Bathtub: You seem to agree with me (and Luke) on solidarity with Russian anarchists opposing Russian imperialist aggression (being for "revolutionary defeatism," a term I do not find useful). Your disagreement with us is over our solidarity with Ukrainian anarchists for fighting against Russian imperialist aggression. I am anti-statist and anti-capitalist, but most of all I am anti-oppression, anti-domination, anti-exploitation and for freedom in all its forms.

I am not going to argue it again: I do not think that the Ukrainian government is "fascist," but a limited-democratic non-imperialist capitalist state (which anarchists oppose). I do think Russia (not Ukraine) is carrying on a war of aggression. I don't give a damn about "international law." I don't care about the "rights of states" but , like Bakunin, Malatesta, and many other anarchists, do care about the freedom of peoples ("nations," "countries," "national communities," etc.) to determine their own future without being oppressed by other nations' ruling class states.

You seem to be accusing me of capitulating to Zionism. I cannot expect you to have read The Complete Works of Wayne, but I assure you I have often written in opposition to the Israeli state. I have often written of my solidarity with the Palestinian and other Arab peoples--without supporting their authoritarian leaderships.

In your last paragraph you claim that I "wave" away Bakunin's anti-semitism. See my review of Correa's new book on *Bakunin.* I cover what I regard as his strengths and weaknesses. This includes his anti-semitism and Germanophobia as well as his penchant for imagining secret anarchist conspiracies.

anonymous (not verified) Sat, 09/19/2026 - 10:20

In reply to by Wayne@ (not verified)

as a ukrainian chatbot*, wayne is unfamiliar with the common english idiom “to throw the baby out with the bathwater” meaning to ignore something of value by lumping it in with other stuff not valued

*or just, you know, an ideologue who consistently ignores stuff that isn’t convenient … ironically enough

Wayne@ (not verified) Fri, 09/18/2026 - 15:48

In reply to by baby in the ba… (not verified)

Baby writes: "you often speak of bakunin while hand waving off his noxious anti semitism"

Baby, Please see my review (on AnarchistNews) of Felipe Correa's big book on Bakunin. I discuss both Bakunin's strong and weak aspects, such as his anti-Semitism.
https://anarchistnews.org/content/review-freedom-or-death

You may also be interested in my overview of Bakunin's opinion of
nationalism and national self-determination.
https://anarchistnews.org/content/bakunin-national-self-determination

For reference to my discussion of Israel, Zionism, and anti-Semitism, write me.

Luke from DC (not verified) Tue, 09/15/2026 - 12:54

Why is it any less likely that Russian anarchists working on their own volition would burn CONSCRIPTION OFFICES than it was that US anarchists and socialists burned draft boards here in the US during the Vietnam War?

Why would Russian anarchists not destroy locomotives used to deliver weapons of war to a place where Putin is waging a war of aggression?

I for one think Russian anarchists have done a far better job of opposing the Ukraine War than US and European anarchists have done in opposing the Iran War and the genocide in Gaza. They deserve our support.

Why do Russian anarchists need to fight US agencies? That's OUR job!

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
&
6
u
L
K
q
S
q
Enter the code without spaces.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.